How Not to Act When Your Landlord Terminates Your Farm Lease

Updated: Jul 9, 2020


Plane over a field (Photo by Edwin Remsberg).
Plane over a field (Photo by Edwin Remsberg).

Note: This post is not a substitute for legal advice and you should always consult an attorney in your area.


You probably thought that I was done harping on the lease issue now that it is after July 1. Well sadly, there are no rules that prevent me from posting on this topic again. Now that notice to terminate has potentially been given to you, how should you act? You may laugh that I would ask that question, but a recent decision out of Michigan highlights how not to act when you receive notice of termination from your landlord.


Pumpkins and squash in boxes (Photo by Edwin Remsberg).
Pumpkins and squash in boxes (Photo by Edwin Remsberg).

Before we look at the facts of the Anglers, LLC v. Oakridge Farms, LLC, let us take a minute to define a term: “tortious interference with a business relationship.” This occurs when a person intentionally interferes with another person’s potential business relationship. For example, your hired hand decides to take another job with a neighboring farmer. The hired hand while employed by you was an honest person and never did anything wrong. You decide to get the hired hand back, call the neighbor, and tell lies about the hired hand. This is potentially tortious interference with a business relationship.

Now to the facts of the Anglers, LLC decision. Oakridge Farms rented a number of farms from RHU D, LLC (Landlord) to grow traditional row crops. The Oakridge Farms’ leases only required 180 days’ notice to terminate the lease. Landlord decided within that time to terminate the leases and rent the farms to Anglers, LLC for vegetable production. Landlord charged a higher rent to Anglers since vegetable production depleted more minerals from the soil. Landlord notified Oakridge Farms within the required 180 days and informed them of the decision to lease the farmland out for vegetable production.

Upon learning of the decision, the Landlord and Anglers alleged that Oakridge Farms sprayed the farms with an herbicide that left a residue on the soil for a year or longer and could potentially make vegetable production impossible. Oakridge Farms claimed that only glyphosate was sprayed and no other herbicides. Neither the Landlord nor Anglers ever saw sprayers in the field but did see tracks after the fact to indicate a sprayer had been on the field. The only proof: at a meeting between Landlord and an owner of Oakridge Farms, the Oakride Farms owner stated that “vegetables would never grow there because of the herbicide he had sprayed on the farms.”